Wednesday 11 November 2009

Watercube Beijing and Weaire-Phelan Structure

The Watercube designed for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing is a rare example of a built construction to date using the geometry of foam. The main swimming pool roof in the Watercube has a clear span of 177 metres, demonstrating the strength that this geometry affords for architecture.

The entire structure of the building is based on a unique lightweight-construction derived from the structure of water in the state of aggregation of foam.This same geometry can be found in natural system like crystals,cells and molecular structures.

Watercube gives the impression of random bubbles but it actually uses the Weaire Phelan foam which comprises of just two different cells of equal volume packed together. Underliying the Watercube’s structure is the question concerning the most effective sub-division of three dimensional space with equally sized cells in other word : The maximum cell volume to surface area ratio.

Sub-Division of Three-Dimensional Space

Lord Kelvin posed the problem near the end of the 18th Century: “What shape would soap bubbles in a continuous array of bubbles be?” Plateau had observed in 1873 that when soap bubbles join, there is always a meeting of three surfaces, forming an angle of 120 degrees between their edges. And those edges are always found, four in each corner, with an angle of approximately 109.47 degrees.

In 1887, Lord Kelvin proposed a solution for his own problem based on a 14-sided figure made of 8 regular hexagons and 6 squares. Now, the angle of a square is 90 degrees and a hexagon 120 degrees. Both are far from the 109.47 degrees of Plateau. A regular pentagon has an internal angle of 108 degrees; however dodecahedra (the twelve-sided figure made with regular pentagons) cannot be arranged side by side without leaving a space between them.

Weaire Phelan

It was subsequently supposed that cells composed of combinations of pentagons and hexagons would be more efficient than the foam of Kelvin. However only in 1993, a hundred years after Lord Kelvin’s first tentative answer, did two Irish professors, Weaire and Phelan propose a structure that used less surface than the foam of Kelvin. Their solution utilised two different kinds of cells, a 14-sided one (two hexagons and 12 pentagons) and a 12-sided one (all of pentagons). Both cells have the same volume. In the packing, two irregular pentagonal dodecahedra (12-sided) and six tetrakaidecahedra (14-sided) form a translation unit with a lattice periodicity which is simple cubic.

The foam of the Trinity College physicists Weaire and Phelan has to date not been surpassed as the most efficient subdivision of three dimensional space. Their solution forms the basis for the structure for the National Centre of Swimming of Beijing where the cells are approximately nine metres in diameter.

Despite its apparent complexity and organic form, the Watercube is in fact based on a high degree of repetition. It uses only three different faces (one irregular hexagon, and two different irregular pentagons), four extremities, and three corner configurations.

Conceptually the Watercube’s form derives from a series of Boolean operations where a cuboid is cut from an infinite array of the tightly packed polyhedra. The internal cavity is (actually three internal cavities are) then carved out from this rectangular box leaving just the supporting lattice frame structure. Finally the exposed cell edges are joined at each façade.



Tuesday 10 November 2009

Cellular Solid


Cellular Solid is a network of struts or faces that form the faces of the cells. The simple examples of the cellular solids comes from nature ,such as the bee's honeycomb or a sponge.There are three kinds of cellular solid ; a 2d cellular solid , a closed 3d cellular solid and an open cell 3d cellular solid.
In Architecture these properties of cellular solid have been used in many contemporary design. The 3d voronoi structure that emerge everywhere in Zaha Hadid design or AA DRL students project in London are the examples.The reason is simply the exploitation of the geometry needs a complex and hard-core digital computation.Your 2.0 core 2 duo won't do it for you mate!.The other reason might related to the high cost of the project it self.
The benefit of the cellular solid properties is the infinite variation that comes to only one result : a high strength/weight ratio.Which means that it allows you to have a fairly light structure for a wide span structure. The most intriguing examples are the structure design of Watercube in Beijing. The foam structure of the Watercube allows it to have 70 m column free structure,which makes it the longest space truss span in the world.The structure itself derived from the what so-called Wheaire Phelan structure,known for the most efficient polyhedra configuration to fill up the given volume with smallest surface area (the structure beat Lord Kelvin structure of such the same system).However the development of the system and application in real architecture project are still really limited.This due to its complexity and high cost building.

Wednesday 28 October 2009

Better Future

Architecture for a better future

There is one expression said that "The blue sky was pink". I am not really sure what that expression really means, but it is for sure that today's sky color are way much better. How scary it might be to have a pink sky and it reflections all over the place. Talking about a better sky, I’ve been thinking of Architecture for a better future,ah... cut the crap will ya ?